www.theminaretonline.com

Archive for the ‘Economics’ Category

Steinbrenners Named 2008 Outstanding Family Business

In Economics, Florida, National News, Sports, UT News on February 25, 2009 at 12:20 pm

The Steinbrenner family of New York Yankees fame will be named the 2008 Outstanding Florida Family Business in an award ceremony on Friday, March 6, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. in The University of Tampa’s Vaughn Center.

George M. Steinbrenner III is principal owner and chairperson of Yankee Global Enterprises, but the business team also includes his wife Joan Steinbrenner, and children Harold Z. Steinbrenner, Henry G. Steinbrenner, Jennifer Steinbrenner Swindal, and Jessica Steinbrenner. The New York Yankees enterprise is not just a baseball team, but a
memorabilia company, a cable television network, and a real estate business.The Florida Family Business of the Year Awards were created in 2001 to recognize the best of Florida’s family-owned, family-operated businesses. The awards are sponsored by Hill Ward Henderson and GenSpring Family Offices and presentSteinbrenner George.jpged by the John H. Sykes College of Business at The University of Tampa. They are part of the college’s Florida Entrepreneur and Family Business Program. In 2004, then-Gov. Jeb Bush declared “Florida Family Business Day” to coincide with the award.

Award criteria include the innovation of the business’s strategies and practices, expression of positive family values in the business, the quality of the link between the family and the business, contributions to the community, and overall growth and viability.

Tickets are $45 per person, or $300 for a table of eight.

Greg McCann, J.D., CPA and author of When Your Parents Sign the Paychecks, will give the keynote address. A panel discussion will follow, featuring McCann, Reid Haney from Hill Ward Henderson, Gene McNichols, CEO of the McNichols Company and past Family Business Award winner; and Stephen G. Salley of the GenSpring Family Offices.

For more information about the Florida Family Business of the Year Awards, or to reserve your seats, contact Angie Ballard at (813) 257-3782 or aballard@ut.edu, or register online at www.ut.edu/centers/fba by Monday, March 2.

Obama Speaks To Congress About Economy

In Economics, National News, Politics, Uncategorized on February 25, 2009 at 11:45 am
Vodpod videos no longer available.

President Barack Obama addresses the economy during a joint session of Congress Feb. 24.

Madam Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, the First Lady of the United States — (applause) — she’s around here somewhere.

I have come here tonight not only to address the distinguished men and women in this great chamber, but to speak frankly and directly to the men and women who sent us here.

I know that for many Americans watching right now, the state of our economy is a concern that rises above all others. And rightly so. If you haven’t been personally affected by this recession, you probably know someone who has — a friend; a neighbor; a member of your family. You don’t need to hear another list of statistics to know that our economy is in crisis, because you live it every day. It’s the worry you wake up with and the source of sleepless nights. It’s the job you thought you’d retire from but now have lost; the business you built your dreams upon that’s now hanging by a thread; the college acceptance letter your child had to put back in the envelope. The impact of this recession is real, and it is everywhere.

But while our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken, though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this: We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before. (Applause.)

The weight of this crisis will not determine the destiny of this nation. The answers to our problems don’t lie beyond our reach. They exist in our laboratories and our universities; in our fields and our factories; in the imaginations of our entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on Earth. Those qualities that have made America the greatest force of progress and prosperity in human history we still possess in ample measure. What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more. (Applause.)

Now, if we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll admit that for too long, we have not always met these responsibilities — as a government or as a people. I say this not to lay blame or to look backwards, but because it is only by understanding how we arrived at this moment that we’ll be able to lift ourselves out of this predicament.

The fact is our economy did not fall into decline overnight. Nor did all of our problems begin when the housing market collapsed or the stock market sank. We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before. The cost of health care eats up more and more of our savings each year, yet we keep delaying reform. Our children will compete for jobs in a global economy that too many of our schools do not prepare them for. And though all these challenges went unsolved, we still managed to spend more money and pile up more debt, both as individuals and through our government, than ever before.

In other words, we have lived through an era where too often short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election. A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. (Applause.) Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day.

Well that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to take charge of our future is here.

Now is the time to act boldly and wisely — to not only revive this economy, but to build a new foundation for lasting prosperity. Now is the time to jumpstart job creation, re-start lending, and invest in areas like energy, health care, and education that will grow our economy, even as we make hard choices to bring our deficit down. That is what my economic agenda is designed to do, and that is what I’d like to talk to you about tonight.

It’s an agenda that begins with jobs. (Applause.)

As soon as I took office, I asked this Congress to send me a recovery plan by President’s Day that would put people back to work and put money in their pockets. Not because I believe in bigger government — I don’t. Not because I’m not mindful of the massive debt we’ve inherited — I am. I called for action because the failure to do so would have cost more jobs and caused more hardship. In fact, a failure to act would have worsened our long-term deficit by assuring weak economic growth for years. And that’s why I pushed for quick action. And tonight, I am grateful that this Congress delivered, and pleased to say that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is now law. (Applause.)

Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs. More than 90 percent of these jobs will be in the private sector — jobs rebuilding our roads and bridges; constructing wind turbines and solar panels; laying broadband and expanding mass transit.

Because of this plan, there are teachers who can now keep their jobs and educate our kids. Health care professionals can continue caring for our sick. There are 57 police officers who are still on the streets of Minneapolis tonight because this plan prevented the layoffs their department was about to make. (Applause.)

Because of this plan, 95 percent of working households in America will receive a tax cut — a tax cut that you will see in your paychecks beginning on April 1st. (Applause.)

Because of this plan, families who are struggling to pay tuition costs will receive a $2,500 tax credit for all four years of college. And Americans — (applause) — and Americans who have lost their jobs in this recession will be able to receive extended unemployment benefits and continued health care coverage to help them weather this storm. (Applause.)

Now, I know there are some in this chamber and watching at home who are skeptical of whether this plan will work. And I understand that skepticism. Here in Washington, we’ve all seen how quickly good intentions can turn into broken promises and wasteful spending. And with a plan of this scale comes enormous responsibility to get it right.

And that’s why I’ve asked Vice President Biden to lead a tough, unprecedented oversight effort — because nobody messes with Joe. (Applause.) I — isn’t that right? They don’t mess with you. I have told each of my Cabinet, as well as mayors and governors across the country, that they will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend. I’ve appointed a proven and aggressive Inspector General to ferret out any and all cases of waste and fraud. And we have created a new website called recovery.gov so that every American can find out how and where their money is being spent.

So the recovery plan we passed is the first step in getting our economy back on track. But it is just the first step. Because even if we manage this plan flawlessly, there will be no real recovery unless we clean up the credit crisis that has severely weakened our financial system.

I want to speak plainly and candidly about this issue tonight, because every American should know that it directly affects you and your family’s well-being. You should also know that the money you’ve deposited in banks across the country is safe; your insurance is secure; you can rely on the continued operation of our financial system. That’s not the source of concern.

The concern is that if we do not restart lending in this country, our recovery will be choked off before it even begins.

You see — (applause) — you see, the flow of credit is the lifeblood of our economy. The ability to get a loan is how you finance the purchase of everything from a home to a car to a college education, how stores stock their shelves, farms buy equipment, and businesses make payroll.

But credit has stopped flowing the way it should. Too many bad loans from the housing crisis have made their way onto the books of too many banks. And with so much debt and so little confidence, these banks are now fearful of lending out any more money to households, to businesses, or even to each other. And when there is no lending, families can’t afford to buy homes or cars. So businesses are forced to make layoffs. Our economy suffers even more, and credit dries up even further.

That is why this administration is moving swiftly and aggressively to break this destructive cycle, to restore confidence, and restart lending.

And we will do so in several ways. First, we are creating a new lending fund that represents the largest effort ever to help provide auto loans, college loans, and small business loans to the consumers and entrepreneurs who keep this economy running. (Applause.)

Second — second, we have launched a housing plan that will help responsible families facing the threat of foreclosure lower their monthly payments and refinance their mortgages. It’s a plan that won’t help speculators or that neighbor down the street who bought a house he could never hope to afford, but it will help millions of Americans who are struggling with declining home values — Americans who will now be able to take advantage of the lower interest rates that this plan has already helped to bring about. In fact, the average family who refinances today can save nearly $2,000 per year on their mortgage. (Applause.)

Third, we will act with the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money to lend even in more difficult times. And when we learn that a major bank has serious problems, we will hold accountable those responsible, force the necessary adjustments, provide the support to clean up their balance sheets, and assure the continuity of a strong, viable institution that can serve our people and our economy.

I understand that on any given day, Wall Street may be more comforted by an approach that gives bank bailouts with no strings attached, and that holds nobody accountable for their reckless decisions. But such an approach won’t solve the problem. And our goal is to quicken the day when we restart lending to the American people and American business, and end this crisis once and for all.

And I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the assistance they receive, and this time, they will have to clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending for the American taxpayer. (Applause.) This time — this time, CEOs won’t be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks, or buy fancy drapes, or disappear on a private jet. Those days are over. (Applause.)

Still, this plan will require significant resources from the federal government — and, yes, probably more than we’ve already set aside. But while the cost of action will be great, I can assure you that the cost of inaction will be far greater, for it could result in an economy that sputters along for not months or years, but perhaps a decade. That would be worse for our deficit, worse for business, worse for you, and worse for the next generation. And I refuse to let that happen. (Applause.)

Now, I understand that when the last administration asked this Congress to provide assistance for struggling banks, Democrats and Republicans alike were infuriated by the mismanagement and the results that followed. So were the American taxpayers. So was I. So I know how unpopular it is to be seen as helping banks right now, especially when everyone is suffering in part from their bad decisions. I promise you — I get it.

But I also know that in a time of crisis, we cannot afford to govern out of anger, or yield to the politics of the moment. (Applause.) My job — our job — is to solve the problem. Our job is to govern with a sense of responsibility. I will not send — I will not spend a single penny for the purpose of rewarding a single Wall Street executive, but I will do whatever it takes to help the small business that can’t pay its workers, or the family that has saved and still can’t get a mortgage. (Applause.)

That’s what this is about. It’s not about helping banks — it’s about helping people. (Applause.) It’s not about helping banks; it’s about helping people. Because when credit is available again, that young family can finally buy a new home. And then some company will hire workers to build it. And then those workers will have money to spend. And if they can get a loan, too, maybe they’ll finally buy that car, or open their own business. Investors will return to the market, and American families will see their retirement secured once more. Slowly, but surely, confidence will return, and our economy will recover. (Applause.)

So I ask this Congress to join me in doing whatever proves necessary. Because we cannot consign our nation to an open-ended recession. And to ensure that a crisis of this magnitude never happens again, I ask Congress to move quickly on legislation that will finally reform our outdated regulatory system. (Applause.) It is time — it is time to put in place tough, new common-sense rules of the road so that our financial market rewards drive and innovation, and punishes short-cuts and abuse.

The recovery plan and the financial stability plan are the immediate steps we’re taking to revive our economy in the short term. But the only way to fully restore America’s economic strength is to make the long-term investments that will lead to new jobs, new industries, and a renewed ability to compete with the rest of the world. The only way this century will be another American century is if we confront at last the price of our dependence on oil and the high cost of health care; the schools that aren’t preparing our children and the mountain of debt they stand to inherit. That is our responsibility.

In the next few days, I will submit a budget to Congress. So often, we’ve come to view these documents as simply numbers on a page or a laundry list of programs. I see this document differently. I see it as a vision for America — as a blueprint for our future.

My budget does not attempt to solve every problem or address every issue. It reflects the stark reality of what we’ve inherited — a trillion-dollar deficit, a financial crisis, and a costly recession.

Given these realities, everyone in this chamber — Democrats and Republicans — will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars. And that includes me.

But that does not mean we can afford to ignore our long-term challenges. I reject the view that says our problems will simply take care of themselves; that says government has no role in laying the foundation for our common prosperity.

For history tells a different story. History reminds us that at every moment of economic upheaval and transformation, this nation has responded with bold action and big ideas. In the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast to another that spurred commerce and industry. From the turmoil of the Industrial Revolution came a system of public high schools that prepared our citizens for a new age. In the wake of war and depression, the GI Bill sent a generation to college and created the largest middle class in history. (Applause.) And a twilight struggle for freedom led to a nation of highways, an American on the moon, and an explosion of technology that still shapes our world.

In each case, government didn’t supplant private enterprise; it catalyzed private enterprise. It created the conditions for thousands of entrepreneurs and new businesses to adapt and to thrive.

We are a nation that has seen promise amid peril, and claimed opportunity from ordeal. Now we must be that nation again. That is why, even as it cuts back on programs we don’t need, the budget I submit will invest in the three areas that are absolutely critical to our economic future: energy, health care, and education. (Applause.)

It begins with energy.

We know the country that harnesses the power of clean, renewable energy will lead the 21st century. And yet, it is China that has launched the largest effort in history to make their economy energy-efficient. We invented solar technology, but we’ve fallen behind countries like Germany and Japan in producing it. New plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea.

Well, I do not accept a future where the jobs and industries of tomorrow take root beyond our borders — and I know you don’t, either. It is time for America to lead again. (Applause.)

Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation’s supply of renewable energy in the next three years. We’ve also made the largest investment in basic research funding in American history — an investment that will spur not only new discoveries in energy, but breakthroughs in medicine and science and technology.

We will soon lay down thousands of miles of power lines that can carry new energy to cities and towns across this country. And we will put Americans to work making our homes and buildings more efficient so that we can save billions of dollars on our energy bills.

But to truly transform our economy, to protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me legislation that places a market-based cap on carbon pollution and drives the production of more renewable energy in America. That’s what we need. (Applause.) And to support — to support that innovation, we will invest $15 billion a year to develop technologies like wind power and solar power, advanced biofuels, clean coal, and more efficient cars and trucks built right here in America. (Applause.)

Speaking of our auto industry, everyone recognizes that years of bad decision-making and a global recession have pushed our automakers to the brink. We should not, and will not, protect them from their own bad practices. But we are committed to the goal of a retooled, reimagined auto industry that can compete and win. Millions of jobs depend on it. Scores of communities depend on it. And I believe the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it. (Applause.)

None of this will come without cost, nor will it be easy. But this is America. We don’t do what’s easy. We do what’s necessary to move this country forward.

And for that same reason, we must also address the crushing cost of health care.

This is a cost that now causes a bankruptcy in America every 30 seconds. By the end of the year, it could cause 1.5 million Americans to lose their homes. In the last eight years, premiums have grown four times faster than wages. And in each of these years, 1 million more Americans have lost their health insurance. It is one of the major reasons why small businesses close their doors and corporations ship jobs overseas. And it’s one of the largest and fastest-growing parts of our budget.

Given these facts, we can no longer afford to put health care reform on hold. We can’t afford to do it. It’s time. (Applause.)

Already, we’ve done more to advance the cause of health care reform in the last 30 days than we’ve done in the last decade. When it was days old, this Congress passed a law to provide and protect health insurance for 11 million American children whose parents work full-time. (Applause.) Our recovery plan will invest in electronic health records and new technology that will reduce errors, bring down costs, ensure privacy, and save lives. It will launch a new effort to conquer a disease that has touched the life of nearly every American, including me, by seeking a cure for cancer in our time. (Applause.) And — and it makes the largest investment ever in preventive care, because that’s one of the best ways to keep our people healthy and our costs under control.

This budget builds on these reforms. It includes a historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform — a down payment on the principle that we must have quality, affordable health care for every American. (Applause.) It’s a commitment — it’s a commitment that’s paid for in part by efficiencies in our system that are long overdue. And it’s a step we must take if we hope to bring down our deficit in the years to come.

Now, there will be many different opinions and ideas about how to achieve reform, and that’s why I’m bringing together businesses and workers, doctors and health care providers, Democrats and Republicans to begin work on this issue next week.

I suffer no illusions that this will be an easy process. Once again, it will be hard. But I also know that nearly a century after Teddy Roosevelt first called for reform, the cost of our health care has weighed down our economy and our conscience long enough. So let there be no doubt: Health care reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year. (Applause.)

The third challenge we must address is the urgent need to expand the promise of education in America.

In a global economy where the most valuable skill you can sell is your knowledge, a good education is no longer just a pathway to opportunity — it is a prerequisite.

Right now, three-quarters of the fastest-growing occupations require more than a high school diploma. And yet, just over half of our citizens have that level of education. We have one of the highest high school dropout rates of any industrialized nation. And half of the students who begin college never finish.

This is a prescription for economic decline, because we know the countries that out-teach us today will out-compete us tomorrow. That is why it will be the goal of this administration to ensure that every child has access to a complete and competitive education — from the day they are born to the day they begin a career. (Applause.) That is a promise we have to make to the children of America. (Applause.)

Already, we’ve made an historic investment in education through the economic recovery plan. We’ve dramatically expanded early childhood education and will continue to improve its quality, because we know that the most formative learning comes in those first years of life. We’ve made college affordable for nearly seven million more students — seven million. (Applause.) And we have provided the resources necessary to prevent painful cuts and teacher layoffs that would set back our children’s progress.

But we know that our schools don’t just need more resources. They need more reform. (Applause.) That is why this budget creates new teachers — new incentives for teacher performance; pathways for advancement, and rewards for success. We’ll invest in innovative programs that are already helping schools meet high standards and close achievement gaps. And we will expand our commitment to charter schools. (Applause.)

It is our responsibility as lawmakers and as educators to make this system work. But it is the responsibility of every citizen to participate in it. So tonight, I ask every American to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training. This can be community college or a four-year school; vocational training or an apprenticeship. But whatever the training may be, every American will need to get more than a high school diploma. And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It’s not just quitting on yourself, it’s quitting on your country — and this country needs and values the talents of every American. (Applause.) That’s why we will support — we will provide the support necessary for all young Americans to complete college and meet a new goal: By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world. That’s is a goal we can meet. (Applause.) That’s a goal we can meet.

Now, I know that the price of tuition is higher than ever, which is why if you are willing to volunteer in your neighborhood or give back to your community or serve your country, we will make sure that you can afford a higher education. (Applause.) And to encourage a renewed spirit of national service for this and future generations, I ask Congress to send me the bipartisan legislation that bears the name of Senator Orrin Hatch, as well as an American who has never stopped asking what he can do for his country — Senator Edward Kennedy. (Applause.)

These education policies will open the doors of opportunity for our children. But it is up to us to ensure they walk through them. In the end, there is no program or policy that can substitute for a parent — for a mother or father who will attend those parent/teacher conferences, or help with homework, or turn off the TV, put away the video games, read to their child. (Applause.) I speak to you not just as a President, but as a father, when I say that responsibility for our children’s education must begin at home. That is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. That’s an American issue. (Applause.)

There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our children. And that’s the responsibility to ensure that we do not pass on to them a debt they cannot pay. (Applause.) That is critical. I agree, absolutely. See, I know we can get some consensus in here. (Laughter.) With the deficit we inherited, the cost — (applause) — the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term challenges we must meet, it has never been more important to ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to bring this deficit down. That is critical. (Applause.)

Now, I’m proud that we passed a recovery plan free of earmarks — (applause) — and I want to pass a budget next year that ensures that each dollar we spend reflects only our most important national priorities.

And yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My administration has also begun to go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take some time. But we have already identified $2 trillion in savings over the next decade. (Applause.)

In this budget — in this budget, we will end education programs that don’t work and end direct payments to large agribusiness that don’t need them. (Applause.) We’ll eliminate — we’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq — (applause) — and reform — and — and reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use. (Applause.) We will — we will root out — we will root out the waste and fraud and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn’t make our seniors any healthier. We will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas. (Applause.)

In order to save our children from a future of debt, we will also end the tax breaks for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. (Applause.) Now, let me be clear — let me be absolutely clear, because I know you’ll end up hearing some of the same claims that rolling back these tax breaks means a massive tax increase on the American people: If your family earns less than $250,000 a year — a quarter million dollars a year — you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: Not one single dime. (Applause.) Not a dime. In fact, the recovery plan provides a tax cut — that’s right, a tax cut — for 95 percent of working families. And by the way, these checks are on the way. (Applause.)

Now, to preserve our long-term fiscal health, we must also address the growing costs in Medicare and Social Security. Comprehensive health care reform is the best way to strengthen Medicare for years to come. And we must also begin a conversation on how to do the same for Social Security, while creating tax-free universal savings accounts for all Americans. (Applause.)

Finally, because we’re also suffering from a deficit of trust, I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and accountability to our budget. That is why this budget looks ahead 10 years and accounts for spending that was left out under the old rules — and for the first time, that includes the full cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. (Applause.) For seven years, we have been a nation at war. No longer will we hide its price. (Applause.)

Along with our outstanding national security team, I’m now carefully reviewing our policies in both wars, and I will soon announce a way forward in Iraq that leaves Iraq to its people and responsibly ends this war. (Applause.)

And with our friends and allies, we will forge a new and comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat al Qaeda and combat extremism. Because I will not allow terrorists to plot against the American people from safe havens halfway around the world. We will not allow it. (Applause.)

As we meet here tonight, our men and women in uniform stand watch abroad and more are readying to deploy. To each and every one of them, and to the families who bear the quiet burden of their absence, Americans are united in sending one message: We honor your service, we are inspired by your sacrifice, and you have our unyielding support. (Applause.)

To relieve the strain on our forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and Marines. And to keep our sacred trust with those who serve, we will raise their pay, and give our veterans the expanded health care and benefits that they have earned. (Applause.)

To overcome extremism, we must also be vigilant in upholding the values our troops defend — because there is no force in the world more powerful than the example of America. And that is why I have ordered the closing of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, and will seek swift and certain justice for captured terrorists. (Applause.) Because living our values doesn’t make us weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger. (Applause.) And that is why I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture. We can make that commitment here tonight. (Applause.)

In words and deeds, we are showing the world that a new era of engagement has begun. For we know that America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America. We cannot shun the negotiating table, nor ignore the foes or forces that could do us harm. We are instead called to move forward with the sense of confidence and candor that serious times demand.

To seek progress towards a secure and lasting peace between Israel and her neighbors, we have appointed an envoy to sustain our effort. To meet the challenges of the 21st century — from terrorism to nuclear proliferation; from pandemic disease to cyber threats to crushing poverty — we will strengthen old alliances, forge new ones, and use all elements of our national power.

And to respond to an economic crisis that is global in scope, we are working with the nations of the G20 to restore confidence in our financial system, avoid the possibility of escalating protectionism, and spur demand for American goods in markets across the globe. For the world depends on us having a strong economy, just as our economy depends on the strength of the world’s.

As we stand at this crossroads of history, the eyes of all people in all nations are once again upon us — watching to see what we do with this moment; waiting for us to lead.

Those of us gathered here tonight have been called to govern in extraordinary times. It is a tremendous burden, but also a great privilege — one that has been entrusted to few generations of Americans. For in our hands lies the ability to shape our world for good or for ill.

I know that it’s easy to lose sight of this truth — to become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the trivial. But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary.

I think of Leonard Abess, a bank president from Miami who reportedly cashed out of his company, took a $60 million bonus, and gave it out to all 399 people who worked for him, plus another 72 who used to work for him. He didn’t tell anyone, but when the local newspaper found out, he simply said, “I knew some of these people since I was seven years old. It didn’t feel right getting the money myself.” (Applause.)

I think about — I think about Greensburg — Greensburg, Kansas, a town that was completely destroyed by a tornado, but is being rebuilt by its residents as a global example of how clean energy can power an entire community — how it can bring jobs and businesses to a place where piles of bricks and rubble once lay. “The tragedy was terrible,” said one of the men who helped them rebuild. “But the folks here know that it also provided an incredible opportunity.”

I think about Ty’Sheoma Bethea, the young girl from that school I visited in Dillon, South Carolina — a place where the ceilings leak, the paint peels off the walls, and they have to stop teaching six times a day because the train barrels by their classroom. She had been told that her school is hopeless, but the other day after class she went to the public library and typed up a letter to the people sitting in this chamber. She even asked her principal for the money to buy a stamp. The letter asks us for help, and says, “We are just students trying to become lawyers, doctors, congressmen like yourself and one day president, so we can make a change to not just the state of South Carolina but also the world. We are not quitters.” That’s what she said. We are not quitters. Applause.)

These words — these words and these stories tell us something about the spirit of the people who sent us here. They tell us that even in the most trying times, amid the most difficult circumstances, there is a generosity, a resilience, a decency, and a determination that perseveres; a willingness to take responsibility for our future and for posterity.

Their resolve must be our inspiration. Their concerns must be our cause. And we must show them and all our people that we are equal to the task before us. (Applause.)

I know — look, I know that we haven’t agreed on every issue thus far — (laughter.) There are surely times in the future where we will part ways. But I also know that every American who is sitting here tonight loves this country and wants it to succeed. I know that. (Applause.) That must be the starting point for every debate we have in the coming months, and where we return after those debates are done. That is the foundation on which the American people expect us to build common ground.

And if we do — if we come together and lift this nation from the depths of this crisis; if we put our people back to work and restart the engine of our prosperity; if we confront without fear the challenges of our time and summon that enduring spirit of an America that does not quit, then someday years from now our children can tell their children that this was the time when we performed, in the words that are carved into this very chamber, “something worthy to be remembered.”

Thank you. God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America. Thank you. (Applause.)

College papers cut staffs, Friday editions due to lagging ad sales

In Economics, National News, Other Campuses, Uncategorized on February 25, 2009 at 11:26 am

By Renee Sessions (UWIRE)minaretlogo

Although student newspapers long seemed immune to the budget troubles of the newspaper industry, many now face the same economic hardship as their professional counterparts.

All over the country, university newspapers are scaling back to accommodate flagging funds, from slashing staff to going online.

Below is a list of the most recent cutbacks, from most severe to least severe, and how their editors either explained or justified the situation.

Washington Square News
School: New York University
What’s Being Cut: Friday issues online only; circulation reduced by 30 percent; reduced staff pay; reduced summer issues; culture magazine online only
Why: “Because of severe revenue loss, a proposal to make significant cuts to the paper was being considered by the newspaper’s managing board. The managing board of WSN voted to approve that proposal.” Read more.

The California Aggie
School: University of California–Davis
What’s Being Cut: Friday print publication eliminated; office on Fridays closed; staff pay reduced or eliminated; circulation number reduced; other expenses scaled back
Why: “Historically, The Aggie’s expenses have been fairly even with advertising revenue. For the past several years, however, ad sales, The Aggie’s only source of revenue, have been in sharp decline. This year marks a new low.” Read more.

Minnesota Daily
School: University of Minnesota
What’s Being Cut: Friday print publication eliminated; bonuses slashed; staff pay reduced; sports and news sections combined
Why: “Advertising had been declining steadily, and in September, ‘everything blew up,’ said Vadim Lavrusik, the paper’s editor-in-chief and one of three co-publishers.” Read more.

Daily Californian
School: University of California–Berkeley
What’s Being Cut: Wednesday print edition eliminated; staff pay and staff size reduced
Why: “Falling print advertising revenue coupled with steadily rising costs are affecting newspapers across the nation and those effects have, without question, reached Berkeley.” Read more.

Daily Nebraskan
School: University of Nebraska–Lincoln
What’s Being Cut: Number of pages per paper reduced
Why: “Simply put, fewer advertisements being printed equals fewer pages being published in our industry.” Read more.

Daily News
School: Ball State University
What’s Being Cut: Friday publication eliminated
Why: “Instead of sitting in a corner lamenting the glory days of print media, we’re going to do something we should have done a long time ago: Use our Web site for what it was intended and be a true, daily news source.” Read more.

The Daily Free Press
School: Boston University
What’s Being Cut: Friday print publication eliminated
Why: “The Daily Free Press made drastic cutbacks in fall 2007 because of a decline in ad revenue, and although our situation has improved, it is not fully remedied. In order to maintain our status as a purely student-run and independent newspaper, we must take care to cushion ourselves against a debt that could threaten that status in the future.” Read more.

Columbia Missourian
School: University of Missouri
What’s Being Cut: Weekend issues eliminated
Why: “The Columbia Missourian has reached an agreement with MU administrators to scale back the number of its weekly print editions in order to ensure its future as a community paper and a teaching lab for young journalists.” Read more.

Sidelines
School: Middle Tennessee State University
What’s Being Cut: Entire paper potentially moved to online only
Why: “A work group responsible for reviewing non-academic units at the university has proposed a restructuring of Sidelines that would save $100,000.” Read more.

Daily Orange
School: Syracuse University
What’s Being Cut: Friday print publication eliminated
Why: “The Daily Orange will no longer publish a print edition of its newspaper on Fridays because of a series of financial setbacks that make printing and distributing a paper on the week’s slowest day impractical.” Read more.

Daily Utah Chronicle
School: University of Utah
What’s Being Cut: Friday print publication eliminated
Why: “Chronicle Editor in Chief Dustin Gardiner says the paper started the year with a $40,000 deficit and a decrease in ad sales this year has added another $20,000.” Read more.

The Spartan Daily
School: San Jose State University
What’s Being Cut: Friday print publication eliminated
Why: No reason given.

The Spectator
School: University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
What’s Being Cut: Position eliminated; staff salaries cut
Why: “Because of multiple factors, including economic concerns and lowered advertising revenue…”

College Columnists: Rick Warren, Excessive Spending Among Top Inauguration Woes

In Culture, Economics, Law, National News, Politics on January 21, 2009 at 3:24 pm

By Renee Sessions (UWIRE)

On Jan. 20, Barack Obama will be inaugurated as the 44th president of the United States. Aside from its historical significance, however, the inauguration is kindling a host of other concerns for college opinion writers.

From using ‘God’ in the oath of office to the lavish parties during an economic crisis, college opinion pages are abuzz with Inauguration Day debate. Click below for some of the most heated topics.


Is choosing divisive Warren a snub to gays?

Rick Warren the wrong reverend for invocation
Source | Michigan Daily
Barack Obama and reverends just don’t mix. An interview with Beliefnet.com epitomizes why some want Obama to choose another pastor. In this interview, Warren makes the conclusion that marital incest, polygamy and “an older guy marrying a child” is equivalent to same-sex marriage. But what surprised me is that before he made this gay-marriage, older-guy marrying-a-child comparison, he asserted that he believes in “full equal rights for everyone in America,” including partnership benefits. Warren has abused his mantle in the public arena to a degree that is reprehensible, and I cannot stand behind him as the invocation speaker. Read more.

Rick Warren an unjust choice for inauguration
Source | The Oracle
By choosing Rick Warren, tt is unforgivable for Obama to put political posturing above eliminating divisiveness between groups. Inviting a polarizing figure flatly opposed to taking into account the opinions a minority of the population does nothing to further inclusiveness or tolerance. Appealing to the majority rather than applying universal principles of justice and equality is no more reasonable in the hypothetical than it is in Obama’s very real invitation to Warren. Read more.

A choice reflecting post-partisan Christianity
Source | Harvard Crimson
While some have charged that Obama is merely pandering to the Religious Right with his selection of Rick Warren to deliver the inaugural invocation, the truth is that Warren’s selection symbolizes Obama’s hopes to move into a post-partisan dialogue for Christian believers and skeptics alike. By reaching out to evangelicals on these broader economic and social issues, secular liberals can create a much larger coalition behind a progressive agenda, and evangelicals can feel like they are not compromising the Biblical roots of their faith. Read more.



Is using ‘God’ in oath a breach of The Constitution?

First Amendment upholds God’s place in government functions
Source | Daily Illini
The value of someone’s oath under the name of God is deemed by some to be a solid and grave commitment to whatever the oath is pertaining to. This sort of bond primarily derives from the thought that God will oversee all doings related to the oath and will, consequently, hold people responsible for their actions. The fear of God’s judgment pressures many people to remain conscious of courtroom oaths, public office commitments and any other pledges they make under God. With the help of this continual fear of judgment, I believe it is perfectly sound and entirely supported by the First Amendment for people to have the right to take judicial oath, public office or other commitments under the name of God, if they so choose. Read more.

Government’s use of ‘God’ not a sin
Source | Daily Bruin
A lawsuit filed on Dec. 30 demands that the phrase “so help me God” not be added to the end of the president’s oath of office. Michael Newdow, who filed similar suits over the 2001 and 2005 inauguration ceremonies, is joined by groups advocating atheism and religious freedom. The new lawsuit argues that “there can be no purpose for placing ‘so help me God’ in an oath or sponsoring prayers to God, other than promoting the particular point of view that God exists.” This argument is overblown and interprets a formality in speech as an attack on personal rights. While Newdow believes that there can be no other purpose to the utterance of “God” but the affirmation of God’s existence, I am inclined to believe that there is a symbolic significance in such an invocation. Read more.

Religious oaths are unconstitutional
Source | Kansas State Collegian
According to the Constitution of the United States, the president must swear or affirm dedication to the office. The term ’swear’ correlates with ‘oath,’ which the Oxford English Dictionary defines as a “declaration invoking God … or other object of reverence.” An object of reverence can be anything, religious or not, and the Constitution clearly does not require any religious text be involved. Every president except Theodore Roosevelt has sworn an oath over the Bible in the public inauguration ceremony. Such interference of religion in politics should not be tolerated and is a direct violation of the Constitution. The people of the government, while governing, must use the Constitution and not the Bible as their text of reference. Read more.



Are planned inaugural festivities too excessive during recession?


Inauguration excess better spent elsewhere
Source | The Daily Athenaeum
The economy is in chaos, bailouts are afoot and hopeful senators are vying for seats left and right. But through all of our country’s various issues, we still can never quite resist a good party. For Obama’s inauguration celebration, Washington, D.C., Mayor Adrian Fenty has estimated that it will cost the city some $47 million, while Maryland and Virginia have estimated their outlay at $12 million and $16 million respectively, according to the Association for Financial Professionals. Indeed, excess has always been a part of America’s DNA. America: the land of plenty, so on and so forth. Read more.

Inaugurating on a shoestring budget
Source | The Pitt News
It seems the presidential inauguration ceremony is above this economic recession, or somehow important enough that the American taxpayers should spend $40 million on what is clearly a second-rate Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. According to the Associate Press, the inauguration ceremony has employed quite a staff, including 432 staff members of the elusive Presidential Inaugural Committee. The origins of this shadowy group are difficult to track down, though I suspect it’s largely comprised of rejected contestants from “The Bachelor” who are desperately trying to relive the extravagance of their champagne and roses days. Only a former contestant of the “The Bachelor” would realistically request not one, not two, not even five, but 10 inaugural balls. Read more.

George Washington U. pays $85,000 for inaugural parade float
Source | The GW Hatchet
If you watch the inaugural parade next Tuesday, you’ll see the new president, marching bands, a JROTC group or two and a float that represents GW. Only, when I look at said float, I won’t just see the confusing mess everyone else will. I’ll see the $85,000 price tag. Obama promises to bring change to Washington, and I think we should be a part of that. Instead of an inauguration float, why not an inauguration scholarship? There would be no better way to support Obama’s “A New Birth of Freedom” theme than by giving the $85,000 to a deserving student who wants to be a part of that at GW. Read more.



Would it be better to attend the ceremony or watch from home?

Watching the inauguration, minus the mittens
Source | The Northeastern News
The Founding Fathers did a great job putting together the Constitution, if I do say so myself. But I cannot wrap my head around why they decided to make the Presidential Inauguration a ceremony held outdoors, in January. I can imagine George Washington addressing the Constitutional Convention, saying something like, “Well, sure I’ll lead your country, but you’re not swearing me in here in Philadelphia during this absurdly hot summer. Let’s wait a few months, until it really could not possibly be any colder.” Read more.

Top reasons not to go to the Inauguration
Source | Daily Illini
Almost every four years, Jan. 20 brings monumental transition for the nation, and this upcoming inauguration is obviously no exception. People have been counting down the hours to Inauguration 2009 since Nov. 2, 2004. Assuming this campus is no different, since Obama captured two-thirds of the 18-29 vote, I find it my responsibility to convince you why going to the Presidential Inauguration in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20 will be a colossal waste of time, energy and money. Read more.



A mini college holiday, dorm subletters and other inaugural issues

Give students a mini-holiday for Obama’s inauguration speech
Source | Daily Bruin
For our country, and for 53 percent of us collectively, our New Year’s celebration begins on Jan. 20, the day President-elect Barack Obama will take his oath, deliver his inaugural address and enumerate his New Year’s resolutions for the nation. In the spirit of these resolutions-to-come, and in celebration of this new beginning for our country, I think we should have a mini-holiday from school. I propose that professors across campus cancel their classes during the hours of President-elect Obama’s inaugural address and give their students a chance to witness history as it’s happening. This would not just be a chance for students to skip out on class; instead, it is an opportunity to see the culmination of a campaign that changed the face of politics by acknowledging that we, the youth, and our ideas, really matter. Read more.

Students shouldn’t sublet dorm rooms for Inauguration
Source | The Eagle
With President-elect Barack Obama’s Jan. 20 inauguration looming nearer, D.C. is preparing itself for record numbers of tourists. While the nation’s excitement is good news for the country, it poses a logistical challenge for those needing a place to stay — and profit-seeking residents are taking notice. If students try to sublet their dorm rooms and apartments to these travelers, they face serious risks. Rooms, houses and apartments are already posted on Craigslist and some have fetched thousands of dollars. Most hotels have stopped taking reservations; potential tenants are desperate and willing to pay. Students need to understand that renting out their apartments or dorm rooms to these random travelers is an absolutely terrible idea. Read more.

Inauguration Day should move to November
Source | Daily Toreador
Before 1937, Inauguration Day was March 4. According to CNN economic commentator, Barry Eichengreen, Hoover and FDR failed to cooperate during the president-elect period from November 1932 to March 1933. The depression was allowed to worsen in the power vacuum. As a result, a constitutional amendment was passed to move Inauguration Day to Jan. 20 which went into effect in 1937. Inauguration Day needs to move to November to prevent such presidential overlap. Read more.

This story was originally published by UWIRE

Inauguration Bits & Bytes: Sick Senators, Security, Poets and Pomp

In Breaking News, Culture, Economics, National News, Politics on January 20, 2009 at 3:00 pm

By Journalism I

Senators Become Ill

Today’s inauguration ceremonies ran smoothly until two U.S senators both required medical attention.

Senator Ted Kennedy (D- MA), 76, suffered a mild seizure during the inauguration lunch, and Senator Robert Byrd (D-VA), 91, required medical attention after being distraught over Kennedy’s seizure, CNN reported.

Byrd has since recovered, and Kennedy was transported to Washington Hospital Center.

“After testing, we believe the incident was brought on by simple fatigue,” neurologist Edward Aulisi said. “Senator Kennedy is awake, talking with family and friends, and feeling well.”

Kennedy is expected to be released Wednesday.

In May of 2008, Kennedy suffered his first seizure, later determined to be caused by a malignant brain tumor, which was removed in June. Throughout his treatment, Kennedy continued his staunch support.

Earlier around the Mall, the frigid temperatures hospitalized roughly 20 people before 10 a.m., MSNBC reported.

Inaugural Poem Gets Mixed Reviews

Obama chose his friend, poet Elizabeth Alexander, to read the inaugural poem “Praise Song for the Day.” The Yale University professor of African-American studies is a former faculty colleague from Obama’s teaching days at the University of Chicago.

Within hours of the reading of the inaugural poem there were already comments posted on the Internet.

The majority of people feel that the poem was too simple and slowly delivered, lacking appropriate depth and passion for the moment.

Others loved it and believed the poem was true and faithful, its simple words creating complex and detailed pictures.

Safety and Security by the Numbers

  • 170 million – Estimated dollar amount the inauguration cost
  • 20,000 – National Guardsmen ready to respond if there was an emergency
  • 10,000 – National Guardsmen on site
  • 8,000 – Police officers from the District of Columbia
  • 5,000 – Portable restrooms (Yes, that’s safety)
  • 1,000 – FBI personnel
  • 150 – Number of multi-agency intel teams in the region
  • 5 – Number of inches thick “The Beast” (Obam’s limo) is
  • 1- P-3 Reconnaissance plane overhead (aka “The Rover”)
  • 1 – Number of limousines named “The Beast”
  • 0 – Number of vulnerabilities “The Beast” has. RPGs, chemical and biological weapons don’t even stand a chance.

Office Space

To ensure an early start and good seats, Jordan Conrad, a 22-year-old Concordia student and his Canadian friends spent the night in a D.C. office building.

He said the scene at the mall was “post apocalyptic.”

“It was like the world had just ended and the only place life existed was on the Mall,” he said. “Some streets were completely desolate, blocked off by Greyhound buses while others were filled with people who were literally neck to neck.”

Inaugural Traditions

Obama’s inauguration had several allusions to Abraham Lincoln at the bicentennial anniversary of  Lincoln’s birth. Obama swore to “preserve, protect and defend”  the country with his  hand  on the  same  Bible  that  Lincoln used.

The oath included the same 37 words spoken since the time of George Washington. It comes from Article II , Section I  of the U.S. Constitution. It’s the only sentence in the document that is in quotation marks: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

According to the US Senate website, George Washington added “So help me God”, and  so has every president since.

Obama marks the first president since John F. Kennedy to bring children into the White House.

Calvin Coolidge had the first radio cast, and Harry S. Truman had the first television  broadcast.

The post-oath celebrations have evolved into their own tradition, all planned by the a committee. The inaugural parade began with Washington’s travel from his home in Mount Vernon, Va. to New York City.

The inaugural balls have been part of the celebration since James Madison’s 1989 inauguration. Bill Clinton’s second inauguration set the current record of 14.

Sources: cnn.com, inaugural.senate.gov/2009/, http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/pihtml/pihome.html

T.B. Business Journal Names UT Best Education Business and Vaughn Top CEO

In Economics, UT News on December 30, 2008 at 11:21 am
Ronald L. Vaughn

Ronald L. Vaughn

From UT’s Public Information Office

University of Tampa President Ronald Vaughn was selected as the 2008 Business Executive of the Year, and UT was selected 2008 Business of the Year in the education category, by the Tampa Bay Business Journal at an awards ceremony on Dec. 4.

Vaughn was one of seven finalists, and UT was chosen as one of two finalists. The winners were screened and selected by an independent panel of judges from Tampa Bay’s business community.

Vaughn, who has been president of UT since 1995, has overseen a period of unprecedented growth and stability at the University. UT has seen record enrollment in the past decade, and educates approximately 5,800 graduate and undergraduate students at its downtown Tampa campus. Last year students, faculty and staff provided more than 80,000 hours of community service to local organizations, and UT’s annual economic impact is approximately $500 million. UT has seen more than $210 million in new construction since 1997.

A recent article in the Tampa Bay Business Journal states that UT, under Vaughn’s leadership, has taken a more comprehensive approach to the education and development of its students than other universities. This philosophy has led to new programs focusing on the development of leadership skills, life skills and spirituality.

The article also states that with many families feeling the sting of the financial crisis, UT has ramped up efforts to make financial aid available to students.

Most recently, Vaughn received the 2007 H.L. Culbreath Profile in Leadership Award from Leadership Tampa Alumni and last year was named Tampa Bay CEO of the Year for community action.

Future uncertain for U.S. students connected to auto industry

In Economics, National News, Other Campuses on December 16, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Andy Kroll (UWIRE)

By Andy Kroll (UWIRE)

Amanda Emery, a junior at the University of Michigan-Flint, was born and raised in a General Motors family.

Her parents both logged more than 30 years on the job for the automotive giant — her mother, Cathy, as a skilled welder in a Flint truck plant and her father, Gary, as a company electrician and supervisor.

Her uncle worked on the assembly line in a GM plant in Flint, and a cousin works on the assembly line at the same Flint factory.

Now retired from GM, Emery’s parents live off their company retirement packages, which include thousands of dollars in monthly income and health insurance for them and their children, among other benefits.

“Basically, you’re talking about people that are assured that they’re getting their retirement money,” she said. “They’ve worked for it for 30 years; they’re thinking their money is safe.”

But with GM burning through its cash reserves and teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, the Emery family is facing the possibility that GM veterans Cathy and Gary could soon lose most of their income.

That would leave 29-year-old Amanda, a journalism and photography double major at the University of Michigan, with the responsibility of helping support her family, assisting her mother to make payments for not only her own house but Amanda’s grandfather’s home in Kentucky and providing some form of health care for Amanda’s aging parents. Her father would be able to pick up work somewhere, but her mother would not.

“Somebody would have to pick up the slack, and I’d have to figure something out,” she said. “I would have to drop down from [studying] full-time to part-time because I’d have to work more — for sure.”

With executives from the Big Three automakers rebuffed in their attempt to obtain critical rescue loans from the federal government, the crisis engulfing the American auto industry has deepened, and its effects can be felt throughout Michigan as more plants shut down and workers lose their jobs.

But hardly mentioned so far has been the impact on students. For them, the future looks increasingly uncertain with parents subject to layoffs, tuition assistance and scholarship programs getting cut and an already weakened workforce set to lose even more jobs should the auto industry falter even more.

More than a half-dozen students whose parents work for one of the Big Three said they feared for their parents’ jobs as automakers continue to trim jobs to stay afloat.

For Dmitry Vodopyanov, 21, a senior at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, each week means another chance his father, a Chrysler engineer, could lose his job without any warning.

And what makes the situation even more uncertain, Vodopyanov added, is that his father relies almost entirely on the media to hear of the latest updates on Chrysler’s future.

“He’s always worried about it,” Vodopyanov said. “And if he’s stressed, then I’m stressed.”

Looking to cut costs, the Big Three have thrown numerous company benefits on the chopping block this year. Among them are tuition assistance programs, which provide employees with money for continuing education classes and degrees.

At the end of October, Chrysler suspended its Tuition Assistance Program for active and laid-off unionized employees. General Motors announced around the same time that it was cancelling a similar program for salaried workers as of Jan. 1. And in June, Ford Motor Company announced that it was suspending its own tuition assistance program for salaried workers.

Each of the Big Three has also said it will suspended dependent scholarship programs, in which dependents of employees received scholarships to help pay tuition costs.

Jerry Glasco, the director of financial service and budget at UM-Flint, said just over 200 students at the university currently use GM scholarships to pay tuition and fees costs.

But with the GM suspending the program at the first of the year, Glasco said those students who rely on the scholarships to cover most, if not all, of their college expenses, could have trouble staying in school because they can’t pay their tuition.

“If that program goes away it’s certainly more difficult for those students to pursue their degrees.”

And for students finishing up their degrees and aiming for a career in auto industry, they must contend with a drastically reduced workforce that could suffer further losses should any or all of the Big Three file for bankruptcy.

According to a recent report from the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich., nearly three million auto industry-related jobs could be lost in a single year if the Big Three companies stopped all operations.

Jake Obradovich, 21, a senior at Kettering University in Flint, a science and technology school where students alternate between taking classes and working full-time jobs related to their degree, said that about a year ago, he was still considering the Big Three companies when he thinking about finding a job after graduation.

“Obviously, with the way things have gone in the past six to eight months, my desire to get a job with one of the Big Three has now really decreased,” he said.

Ultimately, it’s the day-to-day uncertainty, the mounting stress, that seems to weigh most on students — and especially those like Amanda Emery, who come from families with lifelong connections to the American auto industry.

Her cousin recently purchased a house, Emery said. But now, with the threat that he could lose his job for good, Emery said she’s concerned for him having to make payments on the new house.

“It hits me directly with, you know, my mom and my dad and my family,” she said. “I worry about the future. But even then, it’s still, ‘What am I going to change?’”

Economic crisis hits those struggling to afford college

In Economics, National News, Other Campuses on October 29, 2008 at 9:37 am

By Tony Pugh, McClatchy Newspapers

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. _ On a recent Thursday evening, Neal Theobald, Indiana University’s vice chancellor for budget administration, received a sobering letter from Sallie Mae, the nation’s leading provider of student loans.

“Because of the continuing turmoil and uncertainty in the credit markets, Sallie Mae has made the difficult decision to tighten the underwriting on all our private student loan products, which will require applicants to meet higher credit standards. We believe that this action will mean lower approval rates for these loans,” Sallie Mae Executive Vice President Barry Feierstein wrote.

The lending giant also announced plans to “adjust” or raise its loan pricing.

“These decisions were not easy to make,” Feierstein said in the letter, “but the current financial markets provide no other choice.”

At a time when student financial-aid requests nationwide are up 16 percent from last year, Sallie Mae’s decision to make fewer loans at a higher price will deepen the financial pain of millions of parents and students who already are struggling to pay for college educations.

It’s the latest example of how the Wall Street crisis is digging into the pockets of Americans who are far removed from New York’s financial district.

Bloomington is another stop in a journey into America to chronicle these effects on folks of all backgrounds. Journalists from McClatchy Newspapers and the American News Project, an independent video-news outlet, have reported on the wealthy in Connecticut, growing legal wars in New York City, family health and financial insecurity in Pennsylvania, job losses in Ohio and now higher-education anxiety in Indiana.

The project, “Fallout on Main Street,” is available in print, on video and on the Internet.

Historically, when the economy starts to tank, students return to higher education in greater numbers.

“But with the credit crunch and money tight and the economy so bad, I think it’s going to be difficult for students and families to pay that college tuition,” said Roger J. Thompson, IU’s vice provost for enrollment management. “I talk to parents fairly regularly, and they’re struggling. Their kids are down to the last semester or two, money’s tight and they’re worried about their jobs, and they’re just hoping they can get their kids the rest of the way through.”

Amanda Daugherty was just a toddler when her father died, and she was still in high school when ovarian cancer took her mother’s life.

Now only two months shy of her master’s degree in public health, the 24-year-old Lafayette, Ind., native owes nearly $70,000 after financing almost all of her six-year college education with student loans.

The enormity of her debt first hit Daugherty last year after she received, for the first time, a bank statement that tallied all her loans, which then totaled nearly $60,000.

“I kinda freaked out,” she recalled. “I saw it, and my stomach just turned. It almost didn’t seem real. Fifty or sixty thousand dollars? I’m like, ‘Really? I racked up that much?’ … It’s so overwhelming. It feels like I’ll never be able to pay it off. How am I ever going to be able to buy a house?”

Her more immediate concern is finding a position in the ultra-tight job market. Daugherty’s already applied for more than 15 without success. She wants to work for a nonprofit agency, but she fears that the troubled economy may be conspiring against her.

“I think there’s going to be cutbacks in funding and I feel like people won’t be as willing to hire new people into organizations,” she said. “I’m getting really scared because I don’t know what to do if I can’t pay. I mean if I don’t have a job, can I claim financial hardship? I really don’t know.”

After graduation, Daugherty will continue working part time in the university communications department and waiting on tables at Mother Bear’s pizzeria, where the entire night shift on this Friday seemed to tell similar tales of financial stress aggravated by the weak economy.

Claire Miller, a freshman who buses tables at the restaurant, said that her mother, a paramedic, had taken a second job to help pay the tuition for her four children, who were all in college at the same time.

“All of us have jobs while we’re in college because it helps (our parents) out tremendously. I might have to take on more shifts to help them because the economy now is just going down and everyone is feeling the effects of it,” Miller said.

Antane Armstrong, a waitress, left IU last year because of money problems. She’s trying to save enough to re-enroll, but with tips and business declining, her goal has become harder to reach.

Armstrong typically gets the standard 15 to 17 percent tip, with a few who always leave 10 percent. “Now the 10 percenters are tipping 5 percent, and everybody else has gone down to 10,” Armstrong said.

Hostess Laura Cole, a 19-year-old sophomore, had a trust fund that was supposed to help her with college, but because it’s invested in the stock market, it’s been losing value.

“I’m under 21, so I can’t touch my mutual fund, so I just sit back and watch it fail,” Cole said. Her brother’s fund dropped to $20,000 from $40,000 in a matter of months, she said.

Even future college students and their families are taking note of the costs.

On Oct. 18, about 20 Bloomington-area 4-H Club members met at the county fairgrounds to hear about their college financial-aid options from Roy Durnal, a senior associate director for recruitment at Indiana University. Listening intently were Sylvia Reece of Bloomington and her 18-year-old son, Mykel Faultless.

Reece stopped working several years ago to care for her ill father and grandmother. She’ll use her personal savings and help from her first husband, Faultless’ father, to finance their son’s freshman and sophomore years.

To save money, Faultless will have to attend a local community college for two years before transferring to IU as a junior.

“It’s a little bit cheaper, and the credits will transfer,” Reece explained.

Faultless also will have to contribute. He works at a car wash and local movie theater to make ends meet. He also has saved some money from livestock sales through the 4-H Club. Last year, he sold a chicken for $300 and his 310-pound pig fetched $2,000.

The budding business major still will need some student loans, however, and Durnal had a sobering warning for all the youngsters.

“I certainly hate it when I see students that are ready to graduate and facing what would ultimately be like a house payment just paying off their student loans. My first lesson for you guys is to be aware and don’t get yourself too overburdened with that loan debt,” Durnal said.

“I’m still new to all this college stuff and I don’t really know what’s going on, but when he said that, it worried me,” said Faultless, a husky lad with an emotionless face.

To help with the costs, Reece said, she plans to go back to work when her son transfers to IU, and even though he’ll continue to live on their 8-acre farm with the horses, goats, pigs and chickens, the tuition still will cost about $10,000 a year.

“I really hate to see him have to get all the loans and everything, but the jobs just aren’t there, so it’s scary,” Reece said. “It’s downright scary.”

___

ON THE WEB

Follow the series “Fallout on Main Street”: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/mainstreet/ or at the American News Project Web site, http://www.newsproject.org.